USPTO serial 86976054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,700
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew L. Goldstein
Andrew L. Goldstein FREEBORN & PETERS LLP311 South Wacker DriveSuite 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6679CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |