USPTO serial 86976243
ZERO COLORLOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4924681Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2016
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZERO COLORLOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad M. Behar
BRAD M. BEHAR BRAD M. BEHAR & ASSOCIATES, PLLC94 2ND STMINEOLA, NY 11501-3008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Hair care creams; Hair care preparations; Hair color; Hair dye; Hair lotion; Hair shampoos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 3, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |