USPTO serial 86976254
THERESA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THERESA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeff Cohen
Jeff Cohen Cohen Gardner, LLP345 N Maple DriveSuite 181Beverly Hills, CA 90210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry and precious stones; Watches; Precious metals and their alloys; Goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, boxes and key rings; Horological and chronometric instruments | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2014 |
| 021 | Mugs, coffee cups, tea cups, and bowls; Sage bowls; Incense burners; Household or kitchen containers; Combs; Unworked or semi-worked glass except glass used in building; Glassware, porcelain and earthenware, namely, cocktail glasses, drinking glasses, beer mugs, flasks, drinking vessels, drinking flasks for travelers, beverage coolers, jugs, pitchers and tankards | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2014 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, aprons, babies' pants, bandanas, bath robes, bathing trunks, bathing suits, belts, bibs not of paper, camisoles, coats, dresses, dressing gowns, gloves, headbands, jackets, jumper dresses, leggings, mittens, neckties, overcoats, pants, parkas, petticoats, ponchos, pullovers, pyjamas, sarongs, shawls, shirts, short-sleeve shirts, skirts, skorts, socks, stockings, suits, teddies, T-shirts, tights, trousers, underclothing, vests; outerwear, namely, jackets, coats, and sweaters; footwear and headwear; furs, namely, coats, jackets, and hats | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by An Evening with Theresa Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by An Evening with Theresa Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named THERESA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |