USPTO serial 86976397
THE POWER OF AGILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2018
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with THE POWER OF AGILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisel M. Ferguson
Lisel M. Ferguson PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B ST STE 2200SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4474UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Methanol | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services relating to methanol production and marketing, including analysis of the market for demand and supply of methanol, defining the overall service delivery strategy, analyzing the commercial feasibility of product application of methanol, developing budgets and tracking costs, managing methanol inventories; procurement services, namely, purchasing of methanol for others; providing business expertise in the development of methanol markets; business operation of material handling of methanol installations and infrastructure facilities for the operation of methanol facility sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Methanex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Methanex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Methanex Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE POWER OF AGILITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | ISSR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |