Drawing for HOW GAMES WERE MADE TO SOUND

USPTO serial 86976911

HOW GAMES WERE MADE TO SOUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4810337Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2015
Examiner
DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HOW GAMES WERE MADE TO SOUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Kuykendall

Matthew J. Kuykendall Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC2207 Bridgepointe ParkwaySan Mateo, CA 94404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009HeadphonesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2022C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 25, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2020REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 9, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 13, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 2, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 24, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 5, 2015SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 3, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 3, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 17, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 17, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 18, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 13, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 24, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 24, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance