Drawing for KUBE

USPTO serial 86977503

KUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene Pierson

GENE PIERSON PIERSON IP, PLLC7000 N MOPAC EXPY FL 2AUSTIN, TX 78731UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Portable beverage coolers; Portable coolers; Portable coolers, namely, portable beverage or ice coolers mounted on telescoping wheeled caddies; Portable ice chests for food and beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 2, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 16, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance