USPTO serial 86977923
Serial No. 86977923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4883276Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2016
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 86977923?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra
KAUSHAL R. ODEDRA ODEDRA LAW OFFICE, PLLC2020 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW # 152WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1811UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Television broadcasting; Cable television broadcasting; Computer aided transmission of messages and images; Electronic bulletin board services; Providing telecommunication channels for teleshopping services; Providing Internet chatrooms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 13, 2015 |
| 041 | Production of radio and television programmes; Production of television shows; Television entertainment, namely, television fishing programs; Entertainment information; Entertainment information in the field of fishing competitions; Providing information on recreational fishing; Providing information on fishing tournaments; Providing information in the field of fishing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 13, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |