USPTO serial 86978256
MAKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Ryde, NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marie C. Seibel
CALLA YEE KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE STREETSUITE 2800 MAILSTOP IP DOCKETING 22ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, outdoor shirts, shorts, t-shirts, jackets; footwear and headgear, namely, hats, caps and beanies; all of the aforesaid goods for use in connection with the promotion of and participation in sports fishing | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |