USPTO serial 86978658
MARKET PRICE QUOTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARKET PRICE QUOTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. McGinley
BRIAN R MCGINLEY DENTONS US LLPPO BOX 61080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Jewellery and gemstone remounting; recycling in the nature of collection of jewelry for recycling, remanufacturing and refurbishing of jewellery including jewellery with diamonds, precious and semi-precious gemstones, precious and semi-precious gemstones, and chronometric instruments. all to the order and/or specification of others; collection of jewellery, gemstones including diamonds, precious metals and chronometric instruments for recycling | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Mounting in the nature of jewelry mounting in the course of custom construction of jewelry for others, engraving and cutting services all in the field of precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, jewellery and imitation jewellery, precious and semi-precious stones, horological and chronometric instruments; Inscription services, namely, etching of diamonds | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Grading, namely, gemological services in the nature of grading precious stones, identification, namely, gemological services in the nature of identifying precious stones, inspection, namely, gemological services in the nature of inspecting precious stones, measuring in the nature of calibration services, testing in the nature of material testing and certification services in the nature of testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods of others for the purpose of certification, all in the field of precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, jewellery and imitation jewellery, precious and semi-precious stones, horological and chronometric instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |