USPTO serial 86978772
CONTRA PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTRA PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor K. Sapphire, Esq.
VICTOR K. SAPPHIRE MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP10880 WILSHIRE BL19TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMIN SUPPLEMENT DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE RING TONES VIA THE INTERNET AND MOBILE DEVICES FEATURING MUSIC AND VOICE MESSAGES; VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; GAMBLING MACHINES; PRERECORDED DISCS, TAPES AND DOWNLOADABLE AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA FEATURING MUSICAL, DRAMATIC AND THEATRICAL PERFORMANCES; COMPUTER CARRYING CASES AND CARRYING CASES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE TELEPHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICES AND MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES; ACCESSORIES FOR PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY, MOBILE TELEPHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICES AND MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, NAMELY, HEADPHONES, EARPIECES, CARRYING CASES,AND ASSOCIATED CABLING; ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, CD PLAYERS, CASSETTE PLAYERS, DIGITAL AUDIO FILE PLAYERS, DVD PLAYERS, HEADPHONES, HAND-HELD PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT/ELECTRONIC ORGANIZERS; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT CONTAINING MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY, DISCS AND CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR SMARTPHONES AND PDA, NAMELY, APPLICATIONS FOR GAMES AND PERSONAL ORGANIZATION; SUNGLASSES; MICROPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; MUSICAL INSTRUMENT ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PAPER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, STATIONERY, NOTEBOOKS, NOTEBOOK COVERS, POSTERS, PRINTED PAPER WALL SIGNS, NOTECARDS, GREETING CARDS, POSTCARDS; TRADING CARDS; CALENDARS; PENS AND PENCILS; RUBBER STAMPS, DECALS, DECORATIONS, NAMELY, PAPER PARTY DECORATIONS; INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR DECORATIVE STICKERS; MAGNETIC AND NON-MAGNETIC DECALS; BOOKS, MAGAZINES, COMIC BOOKS, GRAPHIC NOVELS, PUBLICATIONS, PERIODICALS, COMIC STRIPS, NEWSPAPERS AND NEWSLETTERS, ALL OF THE FOREGOING IN THE FIELDS OF MUSICAL, FILM, AND THEATRICAL ENTERTAINMENT, SELF-BETTERMENT, WELLNESS AND LIFESTYLE; PAPER BANNERS; PLASTIC FOILS FOR BANNERS; NAPKINS OF PAPER; BOOKMARKS; SONG BOOKS AND SHEET MUSIC; PRINTED PARTY INVITATIONS; MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS; CARDBOARD STAND-UP DISPLAYS FEATURING PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; CUPS, MUGS, SHOT GLASSES; DRINKING STRAWS; JUGS; PORTABLE BEVERAGE COOLERS OF GLASS, PLASTIC OR METAL; INSULATED CONTAINERS OF GLASS, PLASTIC OR METAL, ALL FOR BEVERAGE USE; LUNCH BOXES; TOOTH BRUSHES; DENTAL FLOSS; PAPER PLATES; PAPER AND PLASTIC CUPS; PIGGY BANKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | ORNAMENTAL NOVELTY BUTTONS AND PINS; WIGS; AWARDS, NAMELY, PRIZE RIBBONS; RUBBER BANDS FOR HAIR | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | ENERGY DRINKS; BOTTLED WATER; NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, CARBONATED AND NON-CARBONATED BEVERAGES; SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Terius Youngdell Nash
- Other trademarks owned by Terius Youngdell Nash
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named CONTRA PARIS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |