USPTO serial 86978892
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary H. Fechter,
GARY H. FECHTER, McCarter & English Llp825 Eighth Avenue, 31st FloorWorldwide PlazaNew York, NY 10019| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather, namely, travelling bags, sports bags, holdalls, shoe bags for travel, boot bags for travel, wallets, purses, ticket wallets, leather pouches for holding valuables, credit card cases, business card cases, luggage bag tags, luggage tags; umbrellas and parasols including golf umbrellas; walking sticks; travelling bags; sport bags; rucksacks; backpacks; holdalls; duffel bags; shoe bags for travel; boot bags for travel; wallets; purses; ticket wallets; textile valuables pouch, namely, cloth pouches; credit card cases; business card cases; luggage bag tags; luggage tags; wash bags for carrying toiletries | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, slipovers, shirts, poloshirts, socks, sweaters, T-shirts, jackets, ties, trousers, windshirts, shorts, skorts, capri pants; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps, sun hats, golf caps, baseball caps, visors; articles of outer clothing, namely, jackets, coats, waterproof clothing; knitwear, namely, sweaters, vests, slipovers, jackets, coats; belts | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting articles, namely, golf bags, with or without wheels, golf clubs, golf balls, golf tees, golf ball markers, head covers for golf clubs, putter covers, golf gloves, divot repair tools, pitch mark divot repair tools, golf bag tags, golf ball marker hat clips; golf tools, namely, divot repair tools and pitch mark divot repair tools | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |