USPTO serial 86978906
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin Fowler
Colin Fowler PERKINS COIE LLPP.O. Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; POS (point of service) devices for restaurant operation and management with features such as menu change options, table adjustment, customer information, item sales, payroll information, customer loyalty program access and information; downloadable software that provides a dashboard of information, data and tools for evaluating the operation of a business and its and employees, for creating and analyzing sales and revenue forecasts and results, and providing reports regarding the same, for inventory management, and for enhancing communications between such businesses and their employees and customers; magnetically encoded gift cards; downloadable software for providing consumer information, namely, compilations, rankings, ratings, reviews, referrals and recommendations relating to businesses, restaurants and service providers | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 2015 |
| 035 | Promotional services, namely, promoting the goods of others by means of providing online restaurant menus, gift cards, gift certificates, coupons; billing services in the field of restaurants; offering business management assistance in the operation of restaurants; on-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery; providing on-line consumer information concerning the location of mobile restaurants; providing a website featuring educational information in the field of restaurant operation and management, employee management services, payroll administration | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 2015 |
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring articles about restaurant operation and management, employee management services, payroll administration, and technology related to same; providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles in the field of restaurant operation and management, employee management services, payroll administration, and technology related to same; educational services, namely, providing online courses of instruction related to restaurant operation and management, employee management services and payroll administration, and technology related to same; and distribution of material in connection therewith; Providing a website featuring information about education in the fields of restaurant operation and management, employee management services, payroll administration, and technology related to same | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 2015 |
| 042 | Providing customized on-line web pages and data feeds featuring user- defined information, which includes blog posts, new media content, other on-line content, and on-line webs links to other websites; leasing of computer hardware and computer peripheral equipment for use in point-of- sale transactions; providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows vendors to submit electronic invoices; computer services, namely, providing an interactive website featuring technology that automates restaurant management information consisting of guest lists, guest information, restaurant information; providing a website featuring educational information in the field of computer and information technology related restaurant operation and management, employee management services, payroll administration | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 2015 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |