USPTO serial 86978976
LINELINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 2019
- Examiner
- LEE, JEANIE H
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with LINELINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda Rosen
12920 S.E. 38th StreetBellevue, WA 98006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) communications services | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by T-MOBILE USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by T-MOBILE USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by T-MOBILE USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IBSV LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LINELINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 5, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |