Drawing for GENESIS INTERIORS

USPTO serial 86978997

GENESIS INTERIORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENESIS INTERIORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel S. Polley

DANIEL S POLLEY DANIEL S POLLEY PA7251 W PALMETTO PARK RDSUITE 202BOCA RATON, FL, 33433-3487

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Kitchen products, namely, metal doors; bath products, namely, metal doors; home interior products, namely, metal cladding for construction and building; Home interior products, namely, metal moldings; metal interior doors; metal exterior doorsACTIVE—
019Kitchen products, namely, non-metal doors; bath products, namely, non-metal doors; home interior products, namely, non-metal cladding for construction and building; home interior products, namely, non-metal architectural moldings; non-metal interior doors; non-metal exterior doorsACTIVE—
021Kitchen products, namely, utensil holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 5, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 19, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 19, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 18, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 16, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance