USPTO serial 86979255
ZERO QUIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZERO QUIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hong Kong Adm. Region, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scot A. Duvall
SCOT A. DUVALL Middleton Reutlinger401 S 4th St Ste 2600Louisville, KY 40202-4408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | shirts, jackets, hats, gloves, sweatshirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |