Drawing for THRIVING WITH DIABETES

USPTO serial 86979295

THRIVING WITH DIABETES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THRIVING WITH DIABETES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William W. Stroever

WILLIAM W. STROEVER GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVE STE 104FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-1092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Disposable test strips for use in conjunction with blood glucose metersACTIVEOct 4, 2015
010Blood glucose meters; blood glucose monitoring system with blood glucose meters, lancets and glucose test stripsACTIVEOct 4, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2016MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jul 26, 2016ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jun 23, 2016INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Jun 23, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 3, 2016INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Feb 22, 2016INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Feb 20, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 7, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 7, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance