USPTO serial 86979483
PIRATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIRATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregg Zegarelli
GREGG ZEGARELLI TEV LAW GROUPPO BOX 113345PITTSBURGH, PA 15241-5345UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | restaurant services in the nature of a fine-dining Caribbean-themed restaurant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |