USPTO serial 86979547
MERINO OPTIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERINO OPTIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kita-ku, Osaka, JP
Kita-ku, Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Friscia
MICHAEL R. FRISCIA MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP100 MULBERRY STNEWARK, NJ 07102-4056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All-purpose bags; clothing for pets; garment bags for travel; handbags; horse blankets; parasols; and umbrella covers all made in whole or in significant part of Merino wool | ACTIVE | — |
| 023 | Embroidery thread and yarn; spun wool; thread; woollen thread and yarn; worsted thread and yarn all made in whole or in significant part of Merino wool | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Banners of textile; bath linen; bed blankets; bed linen; bedspreads; billiard cloth; cloth bunting; canvas for tapestry or embroidery; cheviot fabric; woollen cloth; coasters of textile; unfitted fabric furniture covers; covers for cushions; crepe cloth; curtain holders of textile material; curtains of textile or plastic; damask; door curtains; fabric for footwear; fabric for textile use; face towels of textile; felt; fitted toilet lid covers of fabric; cloth flags; flannel; frieze; furniture coverings of textile; fustian; table linen, namely, glass cloths; sackcloth; handkerchiefs of textile; hat liners; household linen; jersey fabrics for clothing; knitted fabric; labels of cloth; lingerie fabric; linen lining fabric for shoes; textile used as lining for clothing; mattress covers; mole skin; net curtains; non-woven textile fabrics; pillow shams; pillowcases; place mats, not of paper; printers' blankets of textile; quilts; serviettes of textile; bed sheets; table linen, not of paper; table napkins of textile; fabric table runners; tablecloths, not of paper; table mats, not of paper; taffeta; tapestries of textile; futon ticks, namely, unstuffed futon covers not of paper; towels of textile; traced cloths for embroidery; travelling rugs; upholstery fabrics; velvet; wall hangings of textile; woolen cloth; woolen fabric; and zephyr fabric all made in whole or in significant part of Merino wool | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ITOCHU Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ITOCHU Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named MERINO OPTIMO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |