USPTO serial 86979972
CALLTOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2016
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CALLTOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA, US
Las Vegas, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda V. Dwight
Amanda V. Dwight DWIGHT LAW GROUP2603 Main Street, Suite 200Irvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, cloud-based telephone communications, telephone voice mail and messaging services, electronic messaging, teleconferencing services, video conferencing services and mobile telephone communications; telecommunication services, namely, private branch exchange (PBX) dialing services and wireless private branch exchange (PBX) services; cloud-based telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice, video and digital data, graphics and images by means of the Internet, computer screen and text sharing services in the nature of computer-aided transmission of text information and images, direct PBX dialing services for incoming calls, mobile telephone telecommunication routing services and unified communications (UC) services in the nature of telephone communications, electronic mail, telephone conferencing services and web conferencing services via global computer and telecommunications networks for the integration of the aforementioned telecommunication services, all utilizing cloud-based software applications; session initiation protocol (SIP) trunking services, namely, voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) services for facilitating the connection of hosted and wireless PBX services to the Internet; telecommunications services, namely, providing telephone numbers of incoming calls from direct PBX dialing services and prepaid minutes for use with PBX dialing plan services; providing third party users with access to telecommunication infrastructure; providing unified communications (UC) services via computer and telecommunications networks, namely, integrated telephone communications, facsimile communication and transmission, electronic mail, telephone conferencing services and web conferencing services via global computer and telecommunications networks; integrated telecommunication services, namely, providing access to the Internet and providing access to telecommunications networks; video conferencing services; transmission of sound for audio advertisements, text information and video data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |