USPTO serial 86980019
MILK & BLUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2018
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active. Follow Madrid and USPTO deadlines for the next renewal cycle.
Need help with MILK & BLUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William S. Fultz
William S. Fultz Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1100Raleigh, NC 27601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; non-medicated toiletries; perfumes; makeup; hair care preparations; hair styling preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations; bath and shower preparations, namely, bath and shower foam, bath and shower gel, shower cream, body scrubs, bubble bath, bath soap, bath oils, bath beads, bath bombs | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | [ Medicated hair care preparations; medicated skin care preparations ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring hair and beauty products; online retail store services featuring hair and beauty products | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Information services relating to hairdressing and beauty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Craig Michael HEAVEN
- Other trademarks owned by Craig Michael HEAVEN
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MILK & BLUSH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |