USPTO serial 86981361
COMPANIA CERVECERA DE COAHUILA S. DE R.L. DE C.V. CONSTELLATION BRANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPANIA CERVECERA DE COAHUILA S. DE R.L. DE C.V. CONSTELLATION BRANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Brown
JEFFREY H BROWN Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 South Wacker DriveSuite 8000Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |