USPTO serial 86981442
NEXTGENID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5207639Status 780Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2017
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NEXTGENID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX, US
San Antonio, TX, US
San Antonio, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen E. Kelly
Maureen E. Kelly Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@VorysColumbus, OH 43216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security and access and exit control devices for internal facilities and buildings, namely, electronically operated reader pads for biometric recognition, and motion sensitive security arrays; Computer software for use in monitoring and operating security systems and access and exit control devices in internal facilities and buildings; Computer software, hardware, and peripherals for biometric recognition and analysis; Computer software to control computer hardware for the secure capture of personal identity information; Computer hardware for use in the field of biometric identification and video surveillance; Computer software for use in the field of biometric identification and video surveillance; biometric access control systems; Access control systems for fingerprint, iris, and facial biometrics, PIN, contact and contactless card access; Electric and electronic video surveillance installations; Computer hardware; Biometric-based surveillance and watch list matching system composed of cameras, lights and distributed servers for multiple input type image capture and the software for face finding, landmark detection and analysis, tracking, facial biometric recognition, match adjudication, central system monitoring and update, watch list management and health monitoring; Computer hardware for biometric analysis, enrollment and identity; Computer software for controlling biometric identity hardware for use in the field of security and biometric identity; Building security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station; Facilities management software, namely, software to control building environment, access and security systems; Iris recognition security devices; LCD monitors for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology enabling users to remotely view, monitor, program, operate and control large and small appliances, electrical systems and security systems in homes, offices and vehicles; Research in the field of intelligence and security technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Computerized security services, namely, electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of point of sale activity indicating theft, fraud, or other criminal activity; Consulting services in the field of homeland security; Control of building environmental access and security systems; Monitoring of security systems; Monitoring of security systems used in electronic tracking for use in connection with homeland security; Providing information in the field of building security via the internet; Rental of security surveillance equipment; Security consultancy; Security services, namely, providing security assessments for businesses and governmental agencies; Verifying and monitoring credentials of individuals to allow third parties to ascertain identity to ensure public safety; verifying and monitoring credentials of individuals to allow access to venues, events, machines, computers, and devices to ensure public safety; video monitoring of facilities, viewable through a global computer network, for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NextgenID, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NextgenID, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NextgenID, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named NEXTGENID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |