USPTO serial 86981587
SOUTHFACE VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUTHFACE VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 RICHMOND HWY SUITE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; AND CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2017 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |