USPTO serial 86981595
ICONTROL NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICONTROL NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
Mitchell H. Stabbe Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP1800 M Street, N.W.Suite 800NWashington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for managing, scheduling, automating, and monitoring of energy consumption, electronic sensors of physical activity, elderly monitoring systems, healthcare devices, physical premises security systems, video and audio communication systems, fire protection systems, safety systems, heating and cooling systems, lighting, door and window locks, home entertainment devices, and home electronic devices for single-family residences, multiple-unit residences, and small businesses; computer software, namely, application programming interface (API) for managing, scheduling, automating, and monitoring of energy consumption, electronic sensors of physical activity, elderly monitoring systems, healthcare devices, physical premises security systems, video and audio communication systems, fire protection systems, heating and cooling systems, lighting, door and window locks, home entertainment devices, and home electronic devices for single-family residences, multiple-unit residences, and small businesses; computer software for providing video communications and video, video clips, and pictures of physical activity for single-family residences, multiple-unit residences and small businesses; computer hardware for managing, scheduling, automating, and monitoring of energy consumption, electronic sensors of physical activity, elderly monitoring systems, healthcare devices, physical premises security systems, video and audio communication systems, fire protection systems, safety systems, heating and cooling systems, lighting, door and window locks, home entertainment devices, and home electronic devices for single-family residences, multiple-unit residences, and small businesses; wireless security cameras; computer software for use in recording, viewing, storing, sharing, and analyzing online audio and video | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of voice, images, and video; transmission of data in the fields of home energy consumption, home management, elderly monitoring, home healthcare, physical premises security, fire protection, safety, and heating and cooling systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field software and hardware design; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for managing, scheduling, automating, and monitoring of energy consumption, electronic sensors of physical activity, elderly monitoring systems, healthcare devices, physical premises security systems, video and audio communication systems, fire protection systems, safety systems, heating and cooling systems, lighting, door and window locks, home entertainment devices, and home electronic devices for single-family residences, multiple-unit residences, and small businesses; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for providing video communications and video, video clips, and pictures of physical activity for single-family residences, multiple-unit residences and small businesses; development of voluntary standards and interoperability for software and hardware in the fields of home energy consumption, home management, elderly monitoring, home healthcare, physical premises security, fire protection, safety, and heating and cooling systems; accreditation services, namely, developing, evaluating, and testing standards for goods and services in the fields of home energy consumption, home management, elderly monitoring, home healthcare, physical premises security, fire protection, safety, and heating and cooling systems; providing information in the fields of software and hardware design and development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by iControl Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by iControl Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ICONTROL NETWORKS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |