USPTO serial 86982118
Serial No. 86982118
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2019
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with Serial No. 86982118?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fernandina Beach, FL
Fernandina Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth A. Knox
Kenneth A. Knox Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt LLP5871 Glenridge DriveSuite 350Atlanta, GA 30328Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 29, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |