USPTO serial 86982176
PRERUNNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 622
- Filing date
- —
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- UNKNOWN
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRERUNNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Warn
PHILIP R WARN WARN PARTNERS PCPO BOX 70098ROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Arc lamps; Flood lights; High intensity search lights; LED and HID light fixtures; Spot lights | ACTIVE | May 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |