USPTO serial 86982382
DEALPATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2017
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DEALPATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq.
Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, business productivity and collaboration services, namely, providing an on-line computer database featuring project work listings and business opportunity listings that are available to subscribers and connect subscribers and users engaged in related activity; providing a secured access on-line computer database via an internet website, and mobile devices featuring business information and business contacts, through which documents and images can be viewed, shared and/or downloaded for purposes of conducting business transactions | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2014 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring transaction management software; software as a services (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking, storing, organizing, analyzing, and providing detailed analytics regarding transactions, information regarding account history and transactions, and reports regarding transactions and transaction data; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for transaction management, workflow management, collaboration, file sharing, document management, project management, content management, for managing deals and deal flow, for managing transaction [ and sales personnel, ] and for performing analytics and providing reports; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software [ for accessing vendor reviews, vendor/service exchange, CRM (customer relationship management) services, and ] for providing data and information regarding available products and services to prospective customers; providing secure, online, collaboration services, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable collaboration software for others to conduct due diligence, manage workflows, collaborate, manage document, projects and content, perform analytics, and provide reports; providing a secured-access website featuring technology that gives users the ability to upload, view, copy, print, download and share documents and images for the purposes of conducting business transactions; file sharing and collaboration services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload, download, share, modify, and transmit electronic files; providing cloud-based, [ mobile optimized, ] content collaboration on-line non-downloadable software that allows users to securely manage transactions, projects and content, and collaborate internally and externally; business services, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable software for transaction management for the management of a wide variety of business transactions | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |