USPTO serial 86982616
MVP MAGNUM VENUS PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MVP MAGNUM VENUS PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Wood
John L. Wood Egerton McAfee Armistead & Davis P C900 S Gay St Ste 1400Knoxville, TN 37902-1838UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, mandrels; mixing machines; spray guns for open and closed mold composite applications; filament winding systems, namely, mechanical winders for winding monofilament glass strands and composite materials such as carbon or glass; drives for machines; reciprocating compressors; machines for the controlled wet out impregnation of fabric sheet or roll goods material | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magnum Venus Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Magnum Venus Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Magnum Venus Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MVP MAGNUM VENUS PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 16, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |