Drawing for GAMBLIT

USPTO serial 86982831

GAMBLIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GAMBLIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theresa W. Middlebrook

THERESA W. MIDDLEBROOK Holland & Knight Llp400 S Hope St Fl 8Los Angeles, CA 90071-2801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing incentive programs for customers through the issuance and processing of customer awards to reward and promote computer gamingACTIVESep 27, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 29, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 28, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 17, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance