USPTO serial 86983054
PRETTY LITTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2017
- Examiner
- FRISCH, HANNA CHO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PRETTY LITTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*
Plus Government fees of $2,600
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Doerfler
930 W Evergreen AvenueMars Goose IslandChicago, IL 60642Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Colored cat litter that changes colors to detect a medical problem in cat's waste; diagnostic cat litter and litter for small animals; cat litter and litter for small animals | ACTIVE | May 30, 2015 |
| 035 | Computerized on-line ordering services in the field of pet supplies and veterinary products; on-line retail store services featuring pet supplies and veterinary products; retail pet stores | ACTIVE | Jul 30, 2015 |
| 041 | Online electronic publishing of text and graphic works of others featuring information regarding pet health; magazine publishing; providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles in the field of pet health | ACTIVE | Jul 30, 2015 |
| 044 | Veterinary specialty services providing diagnostic services for animals; providing information and advice in the field of pet health | ACTIVE | Jul 30, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pretty Litter, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pretty Litter, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pretty Litter, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PRETTY LITTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |