USPTO serial 86983453
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HONG KONG, HK
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina D. Yates
CHRISTINA D. YATES Dla Piper Llp US401 B St Ste 1700San Diego, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Electronic commerce services, namely, providing information for use in editing and distribution of digital media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 27, 2014 |
| 042 | Providing a web-based non-downloadable internet-based software application for retail and ordering services for a wide variety of consumer goods; providing a web-based non-downloadable internet-based software application for creating and accessing user-posted ratings, reviews and recommendations on products and services for commercial purposes; providing a web-based non-downloadable software application for use in processing electronic payments; providing a web-based non-downloadable software application for use in creating and managing a shopping cart-enabled website for use by any person wishing to buy and sell items on the internet through several websites concurrently providing a website featuring a search engine for a wide variety of consumer goods; electronic commerce services, namely, providing information for use in maintaining and updating web sites, blogging, photography, videography, online commentary, and the maintenance of the home pages of social media accounts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 27, 2014 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 16, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 26, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |