USPTO serial 86983537
OLAUNU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2018
- Examiner
- FRISCH, HANNA CHO
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with OLAUNU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Clemente, CA, US
San Clemente, CA, US
San Clemente, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Natland
Susan M. Natland BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP600 Anton Blvd., Suite 900Costa Mesa, CA 92626United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Public policy consultancy services in the field of storm water and water management | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Consultation services in the field of construction planning and constructing of environmentally-conscious buildings and irrigation systems, stormwater capture and use systems, water storage and water treatment systems, water distribution systems, and infrastructure systems, namely, green roofs and green streets, and Low Impact Development stormwater management systems; soil erosion and sedimentation control planning services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of storm water and water management systems, namely, planning, design, and engineering of Low Impact Development measures and Low Impact Development stormwater management systems; consulting services in the field of environmental assessment and planning; professional consulting services in the field of environmental sciences; technical consulting in the field of environmental engineering; engineering services in the field of environmental compliance; engineering services in the field of environmental compliance, namely, municipal storm water requirements; planning, design, and engineering of storm water treatment best management practices, storage systems, and conveyance and distribution systems; Consultation services in the field of designing and engineering of environmentally-conscious buildings and irrigation systems, stormwater capture and use systems, water storage and water treatment systems, water distribution systems, and infrastructure systems, namely, green roofs and green streets, and Low Impact Development stormwater management systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Regulatory compliance consulting services in the field of environmental compliance; regulatory compliance consulting services in the field of environmental compliance, namely, municipal storm water management requirements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Olaunu, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Olaunu, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Olaunu, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named OLAUNU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 24, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |