USPTO serial 86983782
SEVEN BUCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2018
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with SEVEN BUCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dusan Clark
Dusan Clark Sidley Austin LLP2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 2000Dallas, TX 75201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Podcasts featuring entertainment films, celebrity news and information | ACTIVE | Oct 25, 2017 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring entertainment information, information on celebrities, musical videos, film clips; providing an internet website portal in the field of entertainment, cultural and sporting events; production of motion picture films and television programs | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 29, 2025 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2024 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |