USPTO serial 86983851
TRANSFORMATIONAL FITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2019
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with TRANSFORMATIONAL FITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Solana Beach, CA
Solana Beach, CA
Solana Beach, CA
Solana Beach, CA
Solana Beach, CA
Solana Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Laut
Steven Laut SHERMAN IP LLP15760 Ventura Blvd.Suite 700Los Angeles, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital media, namely, CDs, DVDs, downloadable audio and video files featuring exercise, meditation, music and inspirational lectures | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2017 |
| 038 | Streaming of audio material on the internet | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2018 |
| 041 | Physical fitness training of individuals and groups; Physical fitness instruction | ACTIVE | May 29, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Grafos, Lisa
- Other trademarks owned by Grafos, Lisa
- Other trademarks owned by Grafos, Lisa
- Other trademarks owned by Grafos, Dean
- Other trademarks owned by Grafos, Dean
- Other trademarks owned by Grafos, Dean
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TRANSFORMATIONAL FITNESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |