USPTO serial 86984036
ORASANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2018
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.
Need help with ORASANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sanda Moldovan
- Other trademarks owned by Sanda Moldovan
- Other trademarks owned by Sanda Moldovan
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ORASANA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |