USPTO serial 86984088
V THE VITAMIN SHOPPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with V THE VITAMIN SHOPPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VITAMIN SHOPPE PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC
SECAUCUS, NJ
Other trademarks owned by VITAMIN SHOPPE PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC
VITAMIN SHOPPE PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC
SECAUCUS, NJ
Other trademarks owned by VITAMIN SHOPPE PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC
Vitamin Shoppe Procurement Services, Inc.
Secaucus, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Vitamin Shoppe Procurement Services, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy S. Boczko
Jeremy S. Boczko HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, liquid laundry soap, laundry powder, surface-countertop cleaner, scented room spray, toilet bowl cleaner in the nature of toilet bowl detergent, kitchen and bath cleaner in the nature of kitchen countertop and bath countertop cleanser, articles for cleaning purposes, namely, glass cleaners, dish soap and fabric softener; cleaning, polishing scouring and abrasive preparations; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, soaps for personal use, hair lotions; dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen containers; combs and sponges, namely, bath sponges, cleaning sponges, sponges for household use, toilet sponges; brushes, namely, shave brushes, hair brushes, bath brushes, clothes brushes, expect except paintbrushes; brush-making materials; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, dish brushes for household purposes, brush refills for bath brushes, bottle brushes for household purposes, grout and tile brushes for household purposes, cleaning cloths, steelwool; unworked or semi-worked glass, except glass used in building; glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes, namely, dishware, figurines of glass, porcelain and earthenware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VITAMIN SHOPPE PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VITAMIN SHOPPE PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Vitamin Shoppe Procurement Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named V THE VITAMIN SHOPPE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |