USPTO serial 86984286
BRITE:BILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5649644Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2019
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRITE:BILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Richman
Monica B. Richman Dentons US LLPP.O. Box #061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Billing software; Computer software for consumer billing; Computer software for accounts receivable billing and invoicing; Computer software for management of billing; Computer software for corporate billing systems; Computer software for companies to communicate with customers regarding billing and usage data; Computer software for gathering, aggregating, and consolidating data from a company's billing system and then creating, generating, and presenting a personalized bill to the customer; Computer software for creating, generating, and customizing bills and presenting them to consumers; Computer software for creating, generating, and customizing bills with targeted, personalized communications for every consumer; Computer software for creating and delivering targeted marketing messages to consumers through their bills; Computer software for reconciling and delivering bills across multiple channels and platforms, namely, paper, mobile devices, and the Internet; Computer software for setting and sending automated alerts and notifications to consumers; Computer software for consolidating billing data from numerous billing systems, and presenting unified information on one bill; Computer software for customized analytics and dashboard reporting of bill data; Computer software for customized billing and reporting by customer-defined categories; Computer software for customized analytics and dashboard view of billing and user data reports; Computer software for customers to use in creating custom analytics and usage reports based on customers billing and usage data; Computer software for identifying user billing preferences by evaluating user engagement and tracking of user sentiment and behavior propensity based on usage data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2011 |
| 042 | Billing software provided as software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for consumer billing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for accounts receivable billing and invoicing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of billing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for corporate billing systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for companies to communicate with customers regarding billing and usage data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for gathering, aggregating, and consolidating data from a company's billing system and then creating, generating, and presenting a personalized bill to the customer; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, generating, and customizing bills and presenting them to consumers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, generating, and customizing bills with targeted, personalized communications for every consumer; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating and delivering targeted marketing messages to consumers through their bills; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for reconciling and delivering bills across multiple channels and platforms, namely, paper, mobile devices, and the Internet; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for setting and sending automated alerts and notifications to consumers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for consolidating billing data from numerous billing systems, and presenting unified information on one bill; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customized analytics and dashboard reporting of bill data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customized billing and reporting by customer-defined categories; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customized analytics and dashboard view of billing and user data reports; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customers to use in creating custom analytics and usage reports based on customers billing and usage data; Billing software consulting and implementation services; Computer software consulting services in the field of customer billing; Computer software consulting services in the field of customizing customer billing communications and customer experiences | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brite:Bill Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Brite:Bill Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Brite:Bill Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRITE:BILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 9, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |