USPTO serial 86984356
HOTSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Clady
Susan E. Clady Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP200 Public Square, Suite 2300Cleveland, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing audio- visual content over the Internet and other communications networks; Downloadable music and video recordings via the internet and wireless devices; computer application software for mobile phones, namely, downloadable mobile applications for streaming or downloading television programming, movies, and videos and for accessing, viewing, manipulating, recording, transmission or reproduction of video, sound, or images | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Audio, video and multimedia broadcasting via the Internet and other communications networks; webcasting services, namely, providing video on demand and live audio visual content; transmission of videos, audio, images, text, user-generated content via the Internet; providing on-line forums for the transmission of messages, comments among computer and wireless device users in the field of general interest for users to post, share, critique, rate, and comment on, videos and other multimedia content | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website for entertainment purposes featuring videos, audio, images and text in the field of action, adventure, drama, comedy, children's entertainment, entertainment news, cooking, lifestyle, music, sports, travel, game shows, documentary and reality television shows; on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information in the field of general entertainment and related information; digital video, audio, and multimedia publishing services; entertainment services, namely, conducting contests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Star Television Productions Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Star Television Productions Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HOTSTAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |