USPTO serial 87004381
VR BROADCAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VR BROADCAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, QC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Multimedia transcoding services, namely, transcoding of multimedia signals, followed by broadcasting of the transcoded multimedia signals; filtering of the multimedia signals by a virtual reality headset into filtered multimedia signals, followed by transcoding of the filtered multimedia transcoded signals for further communications over the Internet; Rental of computer software for multimedia transcoding services, namely, for transcoding of multimedia signals, followed by broadcasting of the transcoded multimedia signals; for filtering of the multimedia signals using a virtual reality headset into filtered multimedia signals, and for transcoding of the filtered multimedia transcoded signals for further communications over the Internet; Software as a service for multimedia transcoding, namely, software for transcoding of multimedia signals, followed by broadcasting of the transcoded multimedia signals; for filtering of the multimedia signals using a virtual reality headset into filtered multimedia signals, and for transcoding of the filtered multimedia transcoded signals for further communications over the Internet; Rental of computer hardware for multimedia transcoding services, namely, for transcoding of multimedia signals, followed by broadcasting of the transcoded multimedia signals; for filtering of the multimedia signals using a virtual reality headset into filtered multimedia signals, and for transcoding of the filtered multimedia transcoded signals for further communications over the Internet; Infrastructure as a service for multimedia transcoding, namely, a server computer for transcoding of multimedia signals, followed by broadcasting of the transcoded multimedia signals; for filtering of the multimedia signals using a virtual reality headset into filtered multimedia signals, and for transcoding of the filtered multimedia transcoded signals for further communications over the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |