Drawing for ATHENA

USPTO serial 87006476

ATHENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATHENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul K. Tomita

PAUL K. TOMITA STANIFORD TOMITA LLPPO BOX 591838SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94159UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software platform for connecting professionals with businesses in order to provide business services, namely, accounting, bookkeeping, payroll, legal and employee benefits services to businesses; Downloadable computer software platform for connecting professionals with businesses in order to provide business services, namely, accounting, bookkeeping, payroll, legal and employee benefits services to businessesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 5, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 12, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 12, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 12, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 12, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 12, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 21, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 20, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 22, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance