Drawing for REVIVAL

USPTO serial 87009496

REVIVAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WANG, WEN HSING
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REVIVAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel G. Barry

ANDREW S FLIOR SNELL & WILMER LLP600 ANTON BOULEVARDSUITE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, caps, hats and jackets, with each of the aforementioned goods not being historically-based or historically-inspired clothingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 24, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 24, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 23, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 23, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance