USPTO serial 87011545
THE ULTIMATE REFRESHMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5173293Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2017
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ULTIMATE REFRESHMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indian Wells, CA
Indian Wells, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam E. Schwartz
ADAM E SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PLLC244 5TH AVENUE#2157NEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | energy drinks; energy drinks with botanical extracts | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2018 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | TTPR | BOARD DECISION SET ASIDE; PROCEEDING REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |