Drawing for EDIBLE COFFEE

USPTO serial 87012651

EDIBLE COFFEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SULLIVAN, JOHN C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDIBLE COFFEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phillip Thomas Horton

PHILLIP THOMAS HORTON THE LAW OFFICE OF PHILLIP THOMAS HORTON736 W STATE ST APT F301FARMINGTON, UT 84025-4451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee-based snack foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 9, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 9, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 23, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 29, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 30, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 30, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance