USPTO serial 87012713
UNBREAKABLE FRAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUCHA, JOHN EVAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNBREAKABLE FRAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
PHILIP M WEISS WEISS AND WEISS410 JERICHO TURNPIKE SUITE 105JERICHO, NY 11753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sunglasses and component parts thereof and accessories, namely, earstems, nose pieces, foam strips, shields and lenses | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |