USPTO serial 87013270
BLU.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEDNARZ, DUSTIN THOMAS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLU.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Cukor
MICHAEL CUKOR MCGEARY CUKOR LLC7 DUMONT PLACEMORRISTOWN, NJ 07960UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing computerized online ordering services featuring general consumer merchandise; on-line ordering services for others featuring general consumer merchandise; providing a web site on a global computer network featuring an online marketplace by which third parties can offer goods, place and fulfill orders, and transact business; providing an online marketplace by which third parties can offer goods, place and fulfill orders, and transact business provided via an interactive mobile application | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the field of e-commerce, featuring tools for enabling e-commerce transactions, maintaining websites, managing website content, managing mobile application content, monitoring transactions, managing accounts, managing catalogs of products, managing orders, and product searching | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |