USPTO serial 87013404
STEKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Buchbinder
JOSEPH BUCHBINDER THE TRADEMARK SOURCE85 BROAD STREET # 17-105NEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Modular non-metal homes | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building construction services; Construction consultancy; Construction management; Construction planning; Construction of buildings; Construction of modular buildings; Construction of modular homes; Construction of modular buildings; Construction, maintenance and renovation of property; Consulting in the field of building construction; Custom construction and building renovation; Custom construction of homes; Consulting in the field of building construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of factory buildings; Design of interior decor; Furniture design services; Interior decorating; Interior design; Interior design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by System Biologie AG
- Other trademarks owned by System Biologie AG
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEKO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 11, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |