USPTO serial 87014529
KLICKJAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRINGER, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLICKJAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Thornhill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
JOHN W. MCGLYNN RATNERPRESTIA2200 Renaissance BoulevardSuite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for personal computers, laptop computers, mobile phones and tablets for enabling musicians, record producers, talent scouts, music teachers, instrument manufacturers and salespeople, dancers, singers, tour managers, road crew, concert light and sound technicians, and support personnel required for all facets of staging a concert production other than performing with the musicians to connect with each other in order to organize musical performances, jam sessions and concerts, exchange music between each other, produce music, arrange music, record music, mix music, form a band together, perform in a band together, play music together, fill vacancies in a band, go on tour together, provide each other music lessons, sell, trade or rent musical instruments from or to each other, jam together, and choreograph performances together | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line matching services for connecting musicians, record producers, talent scouts, music teachers, instrument manufacturers and salespeople, dancers, singers, tour managers, road crew, concert light and sound technicians, and support personnel required for all facets of staging a concert production other than performing with the musicians to connect with each other in order to organize musical performances, jam sessions and concerts, exchange music between each other, produce music, arrange music, record music, mix music, form a band together, perform in a band together, play music together, fill vacancies in a band, go on tour together, provide each other music lessons, sell, trade or rent musical instruments from or to each other, jam together, and choreograph performances together | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that enables musicians, record producers, talent scouts, music teachers, instrument manufacturers and salespeople, dancers, singers, tour managers, road crew, concert light and sound technicians, and support personnel required for all facets of staging a concert production other than performing with the musicians to connect with each other in order to organize musical performances, jam sessions and concerts, exchange music between each other, produce music, arrange music, record music, mix music, form a band together, perform in a band together, play music together, fill vacancies in a band, go on tour together, provide each other music lessons, sell, trade or rent musical instruments from or to each other, jam together, and choreograph performances together | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |