Drawing for ANKER BOX

USPTO serial 87014827

ANKER BOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIRANDA, JOHN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANKER BOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DENNIS S. PRAHL

DENNIS S. PRAHL LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online ordering services in the field of procurement, namely, purchasing tickets to entertainment events for othersACTIVE—
036Merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services and loyalty coupon payment processing servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment ticket agency servicesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to engage in social networkingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 27, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 26, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance