Drawing for ORYST

USPTO serial 87014920

ORYST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORYST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

AMY B. BERGE MIDDLETON REUTLINGER401 SOUTH FOURTH STREETSUITE 2600LOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical products for treatment of opioid dependenceACTIVE—
036Charitable services, namely, patient assistance programs which provide help to patients that do not have prescription drug coverage or who have difficulty paying their prescription drug expenses by reimbursing patients for out-of-pocket expenses such as prescription co-paysACTIVE—
044Health care services, namely, disease management programs; Nursing services; Home visit nursing services; Charitable services, namely, patient assistance programs which provide help to patients that do not have prescription drug coverage or who have difficulty paying their prescription drug expenses by providing drugs free of charge or at reduced rates through discount couponsACTIVE—
045Providing patient advocate and case management services, namely, coordinating the procurement and administration of medicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance