USPTO serial 87015099
SATISFIBE BRUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2020
- Examiner
- MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SATISFIBE BRUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Centre for the Preservation and Conservation of the Neotropical Rainforests
Toronto Ontario, CA
Centre for the Preservation and Conservation of the Neotropical Rainforests
Toronto Ontario, CA
Centre for the Preservation and Conservation of the Neotropical Rainforests
Toronto Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly L. Williams
Kelly L. Williams QUARLES & BRADY LLP1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5805UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Centre for the Preservation and Conservation of the Neotropical Rainforests
- Other trademarks owned by Centre for the Preservation and Conservation of the Neotropical Rainforests
- Other trademarks owned by Centre for the Preservation and Conservation of the Neotropical Rainforests
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SATISFIBE BRUNE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |